“Ostapenko involved in controversy after victory in mixed doubles at Wimbledon.”

Partilhar

Explosions of controversy and tension marked the end of the mixed doubles match at Wimbledon, with Jelena Ostapenko at the center of the dispute. Ostapenko and her partner, Marcelo Arevalo, secured a hard-fought victory over Edouard Roger-Vasselin and Laura Siegemund by 6-4, 7-6, in a match filled with nerves and contested decisions.

The second-seeded duo thus booked their place in the semi-finals, keeping their dream of winning the London Grand Slam alive. However, the focus of the post-match discussion centered on the controversial incidents that occurred during the tiebreak of the second set, where the umpire issued two consecutive time violations to Siegemund, resulting in her losing a crucial service game. The decision infuriated Roger-Vasselin and Siegemund, who were visibly frustrated and did not hide their indignation after the final point, even continuing to protest to the chair umpire.

The atmosphere soured further when Siegemund seemingly refused to shake hands with Ostapenko, while Roger-Vasselin engaged in a chilly exchange with the Latvian at the net. Ostapenko did not hold back and accused her opponents of intentionally wasting time, reigniting hostilities. “You can accept defeat better, learn to lose,” Ostapenko sharply remarked to Roger-Vasselin after the match. The Frenchman chose to ignore her, continuing to complain to the umpire: “No, but you know what I'm talking about. She doesn't do it on purpose, of course, but we are wasting time. She made her play. It's a terrible play, and she doesn't realize that.”

Ostapenko responded, praising the umpire's performance: “It was a very good call. She did an excellent job. Finally, someone isn't afraid to take action.” Roger-Vasselin reacted with disbelief, but Ostapenko insisted: “Someone isn't afraid to say something when she takes two minutes between serves. Everyone knows that.”

Roger-Vasselin defended his partner: “No. Everything was fine today. She was never late.” Ostapenko disagreed: “She was late several times. Maybe she didn’t notice the clock. I toss the ball up again, but I’m almost always within the time.” The Frenchman tried to explain that they also took time, but Ostapenko stood firm: “Sometimes I’m not within the time and the umpire warns me. Then I try to be quicker. But she never warned us.” She added: “It’s always like this in singles.” Roger-Vasselin replied: “That’s fine, but this isn’t a singles match. What happens in singles is one thing, but here, throughout the match, everything was fine. But you can’t do that at 7-7, you understand?”

O Mundial vive-se com a LEGO
O Mundial vive-se com a LEGO

O MUNDIAL 2026 VIVE-SE COM A LEGO

Despite the discussion continuing after the match, it was clear that Ostapenko and Arevalo are unstoppable on their way to the title, now just two wins away from glory at Wimbledon. Their next challenge will be against the third seeds, Christian Harrison and Shuai Zhang, in a clash that promises to keep the intensity high.

AGORA PODE ACOMPANHAR O MUNDIAL DE FUTEBOL COM TODA INFORMAÇÃO – AQUI


Discover more from Apito Final

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tabela de Conteúdos

Mais Notícias

Outras Notícias